View Single Post
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 01-16-2008, 12:20 PM
Dumars4Ever's Avatar
Dumars4Ever Dumars4Ever is offline
Forum Guide
 
Last Online: Yesterday 06:20 PM
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC area
Posts: 2,167

Re: Toronto Jan 15 7:30 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernie the Slow Adult View Post
DET needs a dependable back-up PG. I don't think they can afford the luxury of carrying Stuckey, AA and Hunter (Billups really too). They do too much of the same thing.
The plan is obviously that Stuckey is the primary backup for running the offense. This leaves the question of what AA's role might be for the playoffs, but whenever that comes up, I think people are forgetting about Lindsey.

Lindsey as a primary backup PG is bad news because he can't reliably run the offense. But as we've already seen in the wins at Boston and at San Antonio, he can still wreak havoc against backup ball-handlers from other teams to help spark some runs. That's a role that can definitely be valuable in some big playoff games.

Does AA bring more to the table than that? I like him, but his positive traits--good defense, opportunistic scoring on defensive breakdowns and in transition--seem to be more or less what Lindsey can give us, as long as Lindsey doesn't have to handle the load of running the offense (which he won't have to, if--according to plan--Stuckey becomes the one who does that off the bench). And who do we trust more, in this year's playoffs, to provide that pestering defense and occasional scoring on open drives: Lindsey or AA? My vote is with the old guy.