View Single Post
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:46 PM
TaShawn's Avatar
TaShawn TaShawn is offline
Contributor
 
Last Online: Today 03:55 PM
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicaaago
Posts: 5,992

Re: Pistons/Magic 2nd Round Game 3 Wed May 7 8PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumars4Ever View Post
Anyone else remember a similar play that happened to the Pistons late this season? I don't remember which game it was, but there was a play where the Pistons were inbounding with about 5 seconds on the shot clock, and somehow the shot clock started about 2 seconds before they got it inbounds. The Pistons were confused and didn't get a shot off in time, and they immediately pointed out to the refs that the clock had malfunctioned. The refs UPHELD THE TURNOVER, which was absurd, but maybe it's the same rule. Obviously the rule should change; they should have put 5 seconds back on the shot clock in that case, and last night, they should have just given the Pistons the ball out of bounds again with 5.1 sec back on the clock.
I do remember that play. It sucked for us. The extreme example would be if the play clock started before the ball was inbounded and the buzzer actually went off before the ball was put in play. It would be ludicrous to let that play stand.

The NBA should probably visit this issue in the off season and come up with a fair solution. It is a difficult problem to solve, because there are so many what-have-yous.

Orlando got to see our play. What would have happened if they would have stolen the ball and made a shot themselves? Maybe if the clock would have been working properly, the Pistons would have shot the ball more quickly. Etc, etc.

If the clock starts too early, it is even more problematic. Players will freak out and shoot the ball wildly as they will be surprised when they glance at the clock.

It's giving me a headache thinking about this.
__________________
"I don't think MC is going to allow us to shoot as many jumpers." Tayshaun Prince.