This thread's goal is to bring peace.

I always thought Chauncey was overrated, and Rip and Tayshaun were
under-appreciated. Don't get me wrong, the guy can lead a ball club.
I'm just really tired of all the blame being put on Ivo and all the
praise going to Billups.

STATISTICALLY, Iverson trumps Billups in almost every category.
The biggest knock on Ivo is his FG %, but you know what, Billups is
an even worse shooter! Billups has shot under 40% six times in his career. Iverson only had two "under 40" seasons, and shot a career-best
45.8% last year (and 45.1% the year before).

Iverson doesn't pass? His career average in assists is greater than
Billups' avg, but of course Ivo played a lot more minutes. So maybe
that's negated.

Turnovers, FT% and 3-pt% is where Chauncey shines. However, Ivo's
FT% is pretty good. He was mediocre at FTs out of college, but worked
on it every year until he became a reliable 80% guy. If you throw out
the first 3 years of his career, his career FT% is in the 80s (78% w/out).

Points, FG%, Steals, Rebounds, Assists, you name it. Better. Period.
So let's not call him "inefficient" on the forums anymore.
Ok? I'm not even going to get into individual accomplishments, because
that would be petty.

LEADERSHIP isn't something you can really measure, but obviously,
Chauncey is great at bringing chemistry to a team. The fact is, if
a good team is missing a starting point guard and you give Chauncey
a prominent role, the team will improve. With Ivo, you have to
build a team around him. He's a superstar and a scorer. That's how it
always works. The trade was a business move for cap space. That's
the harsh reality of the situation.


Let's just be harsher on Curry's impossible job of managing all the talent
on his team.

I notice the word defense was not used once in that post. Interesting.

And neither AI or Billups are the Kings of efficiency offensively. However, Chauncey hits enough triples and FT's to make up for it...

Career Points Per Shot:
AI- 1.22
CB- 1.36

I can complain about AI's chucking just as much as I did about Chauncey's, because both take a lot of those "WTF?" shots.

Either way, no one has ever claimed that AI was bad at putting up numbers.

I can't help but think that the main reason why u created this thread was to start Billups vs Iverson argument..

I'm of the biggest pistons fans out there...but seriously who cares about AI's career stats...or what he's done in previous seasons...Just because he's had a better career than Billups doesn't mean he's playing better basketball them him right now..cuz Billups is out playing AI this year...Right now I don't care about AI's stats from previous seasons...all I care about is his performance this year...

Billups is overrated, and nothing special.

He is not the reason for denver's success. Nene vs camby, andersen as back up vs najera as back up..
Anthony carter playing less as pg vs jr smith playing the sg more..
this are the reasons why denver got so better from last year. people act like its all billups..

and last year at this time nuggets were 26 - 17 in a tougher western conference..

^ honestly, i just forgot to put the defense section. that says more
about me than it does about them.
i've never been of the school of thought that says a great offensive
player has to be a great defensive player too. anyway...


neither one is a great defender. to be more specific, iverson is amazing
at playing the passing lanes. he gets a ton of steals. billups...commits
to the "team defense" approach, but he doesn't get a lot of steals
or blocks (obvious, since he's a PG). in terms of non-statistical
defensive effort, iverson sometimes loses his man. however, billups
doesn't really "stop" any one 1-on-1.

so, ivo's good at passing lanes and gets a lot of steals.

billups is good at team D.

neither one is a good individual defender.

^ misconception. denver is playing well (mainly because of nene's
vast improvement) . billups and ivo have very similar numbers, actually.
a single big game (or bad game) from either one could swing their
positions. in their key stats (pts, assists, FG%), billups is 1 pt, 1 assist,
better. they're shooting the same FG%.

so, they have very similar numbers. even their TOs are close. in fact,
ivo has very few turnovers this season (2.7). you could argue he's
taking better care of the ball than ever before.

so there.

Lol at this thread. Iverson's a chucker who dominates the ball. He'll catch it off a screen and stop moving entirely, turning the play into an isolation. Chauncey is just flat out better than Iverson.

Shooting: Chauncey
Passing: Chauncey
Quickness: Iverson
BBall IQ: Chauncey
Leadership: Chauncey
TS%: Chauncey
Undersized: Iverson
Cancer: Iverson
Overrated: Iverson
Chucker: Iverson
Defense: Chauncey

It was closer than I thought, actually.

I've never been one of the persuasion that being a 'great' offensive player was an excuse to be a crappy defender.

Good team defense forces bad shots. Missed shots are like turnovers. I'd rather have ten defensive stops in one game versus five made field goals and three steals.

Neither may be a 'good' man-to-man defender, but Chauncey is a vastly superior one.

Nene is playing well because he's playing with a point guard who stretches the floor and passes the ball.

You could argue that Iverson's been playing off the ball and hasn't had as many chances to turn it over.

__________________
Straight Puffin' Luffin'

This is the dumbest thing I've read all morning. He is the reason for their success. Don't get it twisted. All of the players you mention weren't doing squat until he came and got them together and started running the show. So he is special, very special and there's nothing you or anyone can do about that.

Now this is getting really ridiculous. Let's try to be more fair about this.