![]() | |
| |||||||
| Forums | Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| ||||
| Re: At Indiana Jan 29 7PM We will expect detailed 6 page reports on every game you watch Oz. ![]() Looking forward to beating up on the Hoosiers. Should be a good game for us to play the kids and find our legs again.
__________________ They are the archetype for dominance. They are the gatekeepers of the conference. They are the Detroit Pistons. |
| ||||
| Quote:
Pacers present unusual obstacle for Pistons ![]() |
| ||||
| Re: At Indiana Jan 29 7PM Quote:
After reading Saunders quote, it sounded more like he was actually endorsing Amir, not back-tracking. |
| ||||
| Re: At Indiana Jan 29 7PM "...he's a guy who maybe can play against these guys because (they have a key deficiency that allows us to play inferior players)." I can see how it could be read like that. The thing is, it is clear to me that Flip just sort of rambles when he's being interviewed. He overpromises, underpromises, flip-flops, etc. I'm not really relying on anything besides his actions. |
| ||||
| Re: At Indiana Jan 29 7PM Quote:
What if the Pistons bucked the system and got 2 coaches? Dumars could activate whichever coach would be most effective against each team. Tonight, he could put Flip in charge, because we are playing a team that we should beat. Maybe next game, Laimbeer could be activated for a change of pace. If a coach isn't doing well, he could be benched until he shows that he is able to communicate and earns his time back by consistently coaching well in practice. I can't believe it hasn't been tried before.
__________________ "I’ll just say this: We’re not talking to teams about their second- or third-best players." Joe Dumars talking about his plan to get other teams' 4th best players. |
| ||||
| Quote:
![]() |
| |||
| Re: At Indiana Jan 29 7PM Closest to similar is situation where GM and coach try the both to do coaching. It has happened and always has ended with total mess. One Knicks is more than enough. |