Quote:
Originally Posted by linwood The Sonics failed to turn a profit with both Ray Allen and (max contract) Rashard Lewis. Even with large public subsidy for the stadium, Howard Schultz and Clay Bennet claimed losses of nearly 40 million dollars a year. If the NBA changes the salary cap, how will smaller market teams be able to afford these players? Also, if Kobe is getting $60 mil, does that mean that Jarvis Hayes is worth 8 mil a year, or does the NBA become a league with one tremendously overpaid player and a supporting cast of D-League rejects making the league minimum?
Perhaps the NBA will have to rethink it's superstar marketing and start building teams that can consistently win against Euro-teams built around the star and scrubs. |
Pretty interesting question, isn't it?
Seattle is anywhere from 3.3 to a little over 4.5 million people depending on how you define the market (from metro area to TV market). It's hard to get comparable definitions elsewhere, but for comparison, in France, only Paris is larger, the UK maybe has two, and Germany maybe three of comparable or larger size.
I wonder how much more (if any) sponsorship dollars a Euro team might get, because the extra cash to sign LBJ or Kobe isn't going to come from usual revenues. This could be a case of talking the talk, but on the face of it, it might be pretty hard for a team to walk the walk.
If LBJ were willing to walk away from all his endorsement dollars and let those flow through the team, then maybe something might happen. Otherwise, I'm must not seeing where the money will come from.
And then of course there is the signing of Childress...