![]() | |
| |||||||
| Forums | Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
| Pistons and Basketball Articles Original content from PistonsForum.com |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| ||||
| Re: Larry Versus Flip: The Cage Match Quote:
On the other hand, any analysis is by definition editorializing. Even how data are presented is editorializing in that particular data are selected, other data omitted, particular formats used, others not, etc. Regardless, I certainly don't apologize for having a POV since that does seem the purpose of writing anything here. I try to justify any POV I put down and thought I had done so here. So, while I certainly respect your right to disagree, I don't think I'm too far out on a limb saying that if what was reported in the press all season as a change in how the Pistons play - from a defense first team to an offense first one - was actually true, then somehow they ought to have managed to put up a few more than two points a game. It's also kind of hard not to characterize this year's offense as one dependent on the three point shot as they made more than 50% more than last year.
__________________ "But first, are you experienced? Or have you you ever been experienced? Well, I have." Jimi |
| ||||
| Re: Larry Versus Flip: The Cage Match Offering a load of statistical data without some interpretation is pointless. Getting people to agree or disagree with the conclusions or opinions stimulates scrutiny. Needless to say, any conclusion will have it's critics. I'm not just saying this to say this. It's your best work yet dba, largely in part because you added some style and attitude to the stats. We're lucky to have you.
__________________ To all of my friends, comrades and companions at PF.com Thank you for another great season! |
| ||||
| Re: Larry Versus Flip: The Cage Match I love arguments that have some data to back them up. Of course you should summarize your findings and draw some conclusions. My point was simply that after reading the introductory paragraph, it's obvious their is some hatred of Flip Saunders. I don't think you need to start slamming the coach at that point. It turned me off. Just my opinion. |
| ||||
| Re: Larry Versus Flip: The Cage Match Quote:
Anyway, I certainly don't hate Flip. I really hope that the interview posted today is true - that he held back and wasn't himself last year in order to try and maintain the status quo. Without being in the locker room it's hard for any of us to know how he may or may not have been torpedoed by various players. Maybe that was the reason the team never got more than part way through the playbook. What I do see though is a team that started great guns and never managed to find new wrinkles when the rest of the league started to figure out how to defend their sets. Whether that was the fault of Flip, the players, or both is sure going to come out in another couple of months or so.
__________________ "But first, are you experienced? Or have you you ever been experienced? Well, I have." Jimi |
| ||||
| Re: Larry Versus Flip: The Cage Match I read your article, DBA. Nice work. I appreciate all of the numbers. As much as I appreciate the work done for the '04 Championship, it's hard to look back fondly at LB after witnessing his antics over the past 2 years. The loss of Ben will certainly help the Pistons points in the paint numbers. First, it will put a more offensive player on the floor. Second, it will force teams to play 5-on-5 defensively and open things up for the entire team. |
| ||||
| Re: Larry Versus Flip: The Cage Match Very nice article. I think it needs to be sent to Joe D, Coach Flip and company so they can see the difference between the coaching philosophies of a coach who won a championship and one trying to win one. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| December 2005 Pistons Articles | Zoso | Pistons Archive | 73 | 12-31-2005 11:40 AM |