I'm bored, so I'll throw this out and deal with the aftermath. Is Marbury such a bad PG? Is he worth 21 mil, no. But, to a team looking the get in the 2010 free agent hunt and remain a contender, he just might deserve a second look. Sign [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Mickael Pietrus and trade CB and TP for Marbury. [/FONT]I know it sounds crazy! But, do you realize how much cap space we'd have next year? Starters: SM, RH, MP, AD and RW Bench: RS, AA, Draft Pick, JM/AL and Ratliff/Samb I think we'd have a better penetrating team, we'd be faster, and our defense wouldn't change that much. Can we still contend? I think so. Are we setting the bar too high for a first year coach to lead us to the promise land? We might be. For the most part, the core would be still intact. It's a risk. But it's a risk that would put us in a REALLY good position come 2010. [FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif][/FONT]
Re: 2009/2010 - We COULD join the party with one trade. Okay. I've learned something already: you should fully wake up before posting. It clears space for NEXT YEAR (2009/2010). And there looks to be nothing there. Going back to sleep.
