![]() | |
| |||||||
| Forums | Home | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| ||||
| Re: Mitchell Report - A little light reading, anyone? Hmmm...let's see here... $20M divided by 409 pages comes out to....... about $49,000 per page. That kinda makes $600 hammers and toilet seats look like genuine bargains ![]() It's no wonder many people around the world scorn us...we're stupid! |
| ||||
| Re: Mitchell Report - A little light reading, anyone? Some general observations: I saw the original press confernce and it appeared that Senator Mtichell was running for congress again. In the Selig rebuttal/response it appeared that he had not read the report yet? Of course the Union boss denies everything...deny..deny..deny I wonder if Roger Clemens pitches another 2-3 years if this report is not released Does he and Bonds get asterisks next their names in the HOF snd when does a picture of one of his CY Young trophies with a needle sticking out of it appears in the papers... How come there was no mention of Sosa and McGuire in the report and are they at home gloating knowing that they should be in it ![]() If you look at the last 30 pages of the report in appendix D, it appears that some drug lorb by the name of Kirk Radowski made a mint off these players and finally..no wonder Halle Berry left David Justice ![]()
__________________ "Once you go Barack, you never go Bak" Mario Cantone 2008 |
| ||||
| Re: Mitchell Report - A little light reading, anyone? My rules would be... Every player going forward who tests positive for steroids/ HGH:
I really don't see why the player's union doesn't want steroids out of the game. All these cheaters are taking huge amounts of money from the honest guys. Another thought would be to put a clause in contracts that invalidates them if the players ever tests positive. In a way, the player is committing fraud against their employer by artificially boosting their resume before signing a huge contract.
__________________ "I’ll just say this: We’re not talking to teams about their second- or third-best players." Joe Dumars talking about his plan to get other teams' 4th best players. Last edited by TaShawn : 12-13-2007 at 09:33 PM. |
| ||||
| Re: Mitchell Report - A little light reading, anyone? Sounds good to me. But the player testing positive should be submitted to a number of further testings within a reasonable time frame before an ultimate decision on whether or not to enforce the penalties. |
| ||||
| Re: Mitchell Report - A little light reading, anyone? Bear with me as I venture into sci-fi nerd land here. What happens to baseball in the event that genetic alteration, safe HGH, and other body enhancements (with no negative side effects) become common in the general population in 50 years say? Will baseball players be required to be 200 lb weaklings with circa 2000 bodies? It seems like we are rapidly approaching a date, certainly within 100 years, when this will be a reality. Will it lead to the death of sports? Will athletes be allowed to enhance, but only to a specified level, like race cars? I'm just interested in the threshold between forcing athletes to protect their health and preventing them from cheating. Right now they are equally important it seems. What if they are in opposition, i.e. preventing the cheating harms their health (like in my future scenario).
__________________ "I’ll just say this: We’re not talking to teams about their second- or third-best players." Joe Dumars talking about his plan to get other teams' 4th best players. |